Risk appetite and risk tolerence - a consultation paper

Save for later

Favourite

Posted by APM on 8th Jul 2011

Under the overall direction of a working group from the Institute of Risk Management a consultation paper has been compiled on risk appetite and risk tolerence.

The group held a series of meetings to explore ideas and agree on the direction of the paper. After healthy discussions, and given the nature of the topic, there were areas that proved contentious. This outline of thinking was presented in various meetings and a draft of the paper circulated to in excess of fifty individuals. The institute has now circulated it for wider consultation knowing that future editions of this guidance may well be subject to major revisions. This will be a sign of good and healthy progress and it is in that context that we present this paper for your comments.

The purpose of this paper is in the first instance to provide guidance to directors, risk professionals and others tasked with advising boards on compliance with the part of the UK Corporate Governance Code that states that the board is responsible for determining the nature and extent of the significant risks it is willing to take in achieving its strategic objectives (Financial Reporting Council, 2010).

However, it is hoped that the approach contained in here will have far broader resonance with anyone interested in the subject of Risk Appetite and Risk Tolerance. While this is not a subject with an untarnished history: most UK banks would have been expected to define their risk appetite, we are now poised to move beyond that thinking. Not a single bank would have said that it wished to court (and in some instances succumb to) oblivion in the form of the financial crisis. Whether it is a matter of setting, monitoring or overseeing risk appetite, this is a subject that has proved to be somewhat elusive -it means many different things to many different people. For example, some see it as a series of limits, some see it as empowerment, some see it as something that has to be expressed in terms of net risk and others gross. For this reason the subject deserves some serious attention.

In writing this paper, the institute were conscious that it may appear to have come at this from a UK, quoted company-centric perspective and that this is counter to IRM's international ethos. In fact, while this guidance has been written with the UK Corporate Governance Code in mind, it has also been developed in the hope that it is applicable to all sectors in all geographies. We would welcome feedback from readers in this regard.

Full details of the consultation paper can be found at the link below.

Comments on this site are moderated. Please allow up to 24 hours for your comment to be published on this site. Thank you for adding your comment.
{{comments.length}}CommentComments
{{item.AuthorName}}

{{item.AuthorName}} {{item.AuthorName}} says on {{item.DateFormattedString}}:

Share this page

Recommended blogs

Trust me, I'm a project manager

8 March 2017

Taking on your Chartered status will, APM hopes, give you much more power as a project manager.

Save for later

Favourite

Project management is a compelling career for all

20 October 2016

We must do more to make project management a career of first choice for more young people in the UK...

Save for later

Favourite

Recommended news

Save for later

Favourite

Save for later

Favourite

Join APM

Sign up to the APM Newsletter.