From “Doing projects” to “Owning outcomes”: How ChPP changed me

A moment of professional reckoning

When I set out to achieve Chartered Project Professional (ChPP) status through The Association for Project Management (APM), I was not seeking a badge or a credential for its own sake. I was looking for an external, evidence-based test of how I make decisions in environments where objectives conflict, interdependencies are tight, risk materialises in real time, and to place me on a global stage, benchmarked against the highest standards of project management practice.

After more than 13 years delivering complex infrastructure and construction programmes across multiple geographies, I had accumulated significant experience. Yet experience alone does not automatically translate into recognised professional practice. The pursuit of ChPP became a deliberate decision to interrogate my own leadership: not simply what I delivered, but how I exercised judgement, upheld ethics, learned continuously and brought stakeholders with me through complexity.

That shift from “doing projects” to “owning outcomes” is what ultimately defined the journey.

Why ChPP: Proving professional practice

The real value of ChPP lies in its focus on professional practice under genuine complexity. The standard requires evidence of delivering outcomes across multiple work packages, with numerous stakeholders, often holding competing interests and navigating non-trivial risk. This reflects the reality of modern programme environments far more accurately than simplified case studies or isolated success stories.

In preparing my submission, I realised that the assessment was not interested in whether a schedule had been recovered or a cost variance reduced. It required clarity on the “so what”. Which trade-offs were considered? What alternatives were rejected and why? How was buy-in secured? What measurable change occurred as a direct result of leadership decisions?

The process sharpened my articulation of cause and effect. It encouraged precision in describing how governance decisions influenced outcomes, how risk responses reduced exposure in tangible terms and how stakeholder engagement altered the trajectory of a programme.

Equally important was the emphasis on ethics and continuing professional development. The reflective discipline demanded by ChPP formalised learning habits I had practised informally for years. I began curating a structured learning backlog, aligning CPD to clearly identified development gaps, and making deliberate space for peer mentoring and professional challenge. The framework reinforced that professional growth must be intentional, not incidental.

Choosing and structuring evidence

My starting point was a candid self-assessment against the competence criteria. This required setting aside titles, reputation and examining whether my work genuinely met the threshold of complexity defined by the standard.

I then selected projects that clearly demonstrated multi-layered challenges where risk was material, stakeholder alignment was fragile and outcomes were far from guaranteed. For each case, I created a concise “evidence map” structured around a disciplined narrative: what I faced, what I decided, how I executed, the outcome achieved and the evidence available.

This approach prevented narrative drift and removed reliance on generalised statements. It required stripping away buzzwords and focusing on decisions that materially altered exposure, preserved value, protected milestones or strengthened governance. The discipline of mapping actions to criteria reinforced the distinction between describing activity and demonstrating professional competence.

Preparing for the professional discussion

I approached the professional discussion not as a retrospective recounting of “war stories”, but as a scenario-based conversation about live decision making. Mock sessions were built around hypothetical pivots: what if a sponsor rejected a recommendation; what if a late design change cascaded into third-party approvals; what if an accepted risk crystallised unexpectedly?

Preparing in this way ensured that I could explain trade-offs in real time and demonstrate how I would reassess options under pressure. It reinforced that ChPP is designed to recognise professionalism measured judgement, ethical clarity and structured thinking rather than dramatic anecdotes.

The preparation also grounded me firmly in ethical responsibility. It required demonstrating candour when data was uncomfortable, the willingness to escalate early rather than defer difficult conversations and the humility to seek independent challenge when decisions carried significant consequence.

What changed afterwards

ChPP did not alter my job title. It changed how I am heard.

There is a discernible difference when clients and colleagues know that professional practice has been externally assessed against a rigorous standard. Conversations shift subtly towards trust in judgement and confidence in governance. The designation provides independent validation that competence extends beyond organisational context or geography.

Internally, it has made me more deliberate about capability building. I have invested more intentionally in mentoring emerging professionals, establishing peer review forums, running interview practice circles and sharing structured templates that demystify the ChPP process. The objective is not only to support individual accreditation, but to raise collective professional maturity.

Externally, ChPP has opened broader conversations about capability frameworks and career pathways for planners and project managers operating in complex environments. It has reinforced the importance of competence-based progression rather than title-based advancement.

A continuing commitment

Achieving ChPP has been both affirming and transformative. It clarified that professional growth is not measured solely by scale of delivery, but by the quality of judgement applied when trade-offs are unavoidable and risk is real. It reinforced that leadership maturity is evidenced in decisions taken under scrutiny and uncertainty.

Chartered status is not an endpoint. It is a renewed commitment to uphold standards, to practise ethically, to continue learning and to contribute actively to the advancement of the profession.

For me, the journey marked a transition from managing outputs to owning outcomes and from accumulating experience to demonstrating accountable professional practice. 

 

You may also be interested in:

• Apply for Chartered Project Professional today
• Discover our new Chartered Project Professional pathway
• Qualifications and training