Skip to content

Six essential points for project consistency

Clients are facing increasingly complex conundrums when managing projects and programmes. Be it working across multiple locations, or managing a number of projects at a single location. Ensuring consistency across all works – regardless of geography or time zone – is critical to meeting a basic project objective.

But how is this to be achieved? How do we get to “one version of the truth” and ensure all teams are not only working to the same objectives, but are making decisions based on the correct set of data? At Mace, we have undertaken delivery partner, programme management and project controls commissions across numerous projects, clients, sectors and industries and there are some key lessons we can share, regardless of your industry, whether you are in the private or public sector or size of your business:

  1. One size does not fit all: it is vital you understand what the business objectives are and tailor your solution around them, being mindful of cost and time factors when making your assessment;
  1. Disciplines do not change, but need to be adapted: “best practice” comes in many shapes and sizes. Understanding which is best suited to your company’s needs is the imperative of good project, programme and portfolio management;
  1. Building on lessons learnt: taking the lessons learnt from our retail clients who are very focused with efficiency savings as a benefit into our property and infrastructure clients brings a unique solution. Many clients can become very focused on the construction aspects of the project at the expense of value for money across their portfolio of works – being mindful of all aspects is vital to project success;
  1. Dealing with change: adapting and changing through the life cycle of any commission or project is crucial. Dealing with change should be part of any good solution and should not be avoided; 
  1. Establish an assurance framework: understanding your business and project, and then building your delivery framework early around these needs is fundamental. Failure can often be attributed to not understanding those goals and not establishing the right framework; and,
  1. Driving performance improvement: if it’s set up properly then the data you obtain from the programme manager or delivery partner should be able to start to provide evidence and trends and benchmarks that enable you to incrementally improve your business. It is about having solutions and environments that can be adapted to each commission’s unique needs, but always aligning to industry “best practice” standards. It is vital that we understand where the delivery responsibility aspects lie and how we assure delivery certainty, as well as managing and driving the required benefits. We’ve asked some of our client experts to share their experience and lessons of using a delivery partner and managing PMO. Despite working across sectors, geographies and public and private, you’ll see some common themes we can all learn from.

1 comments

Join the conversation!

Log in to post a comment, or create an account if you don't have one already.

  1. Tim Podesta
    Tim Podesta 30 June 2017, 10:48 AM

    Mark, thank you for the blog post which caught my attention as an advocate for measuring and benchmarking for two reasons. First the discussion of complexity in programmes and projects is an area I have extensive experience from a corporate and academic perspective. I had the opportunity to develop and test a measure for complexity to help decision makers understand the sources of complexity and make informed choices about pace, assurance, staffing and structure. The second aspect was your point on having structured assurance and would recommend readers looking at the Assurance SIG's work on integrated assurance and an assurance measures tool-kit - aimed at supporting awareness and consistency across a programme or portfolio.