In this blog post, the third in a series of four dealing with what to include in the seventh edition of the APM Body of Knowledge, the question is: ‘What shall we do about PMOs?'
Divided by a common language
Its a long-standing joke that the UK and the USA are divided by a common language. English is the third most widely-spoken language, with Chinese in its various forms topping the league table. But one statistic I found interesting from www.ethnologue.com is that it turns out that 389 (or nearly 6%) of the worlds languages have at least one million speakers and account for 94% of the worlds population. By contrast, the remaining 94% of languages are spoken by only 6% of the worlds people.
Language is important for two reasons communication, obviously, but also because speaking a language badges you as a member of a recognisable community.
In an article I wrote soon after joining APM I noted how Id been struck by the tribes within the project management arena, and Im inclined to believe that more often than not we each hide behind our favoured phrases, terms and definitions to emphasise our differences rather than our similarities.
As we are now at the drafting stage of the Body of Knowledge 6th edition, we are beginning to see that we need to face the challenge of language and terminology. APMs glossary is well-known, but now might be the time to take forward APMs suggestion to BSI of working towards a convergence of terms - to work towards a common glossary which would iron out the differences sometimes real, sometimes imagined, I guess between APM, the PRINCE2 family, BSI and so on. There is a danger that the endeavour could turn out to be as unrealisable as Casaubons Key to all Mythologies, in George Eliots Middlemarch, but I still think its worth APM - with the support of and input from all the other key players - taking the plunge.