The missing link in project success
How do we, as organisations, regardless of whether we are public or private sector, achieve real value? This article will make the case that sustained stewardship and the patience to see things through, as well as ongoing benefits tracking and intervention well beyond ‘Gate 5’. At Gate 5, the focus is on checking if the benefits are being realised (not just if the project was delivered on time or on budget), making sure someone is responsible for tracking and reporting these benefits, and deciding if any further action is needed to keep things on track.
Context
UK government projects frequently pass delivery gates but still struggle to convert expected value into realised benefits once services go live, with the PAC noting in May 2024 that departments spend “too little time and effort” defining and tracking value after implementation, turning Gate 5 into the end of reporting rather than the start of rigorous benefits oversight despite the IPA’s £834bn portfolio and £719bn in monetised benefits demanding strong post delivery assurance.
Meanwhile, although UK private sector firms tend to demonstrate stronger management practices and clearer links to productivity and outcomes, they face similar challenges with value leakage when benefits tracking is not embedded in governance, and while no headline statistic exists, the underlying issues and solutions mirror those in the public sector.
Closing the gap between delivery and realised benefits
Across organisations, projects often pass formal delivery gates but still fall short of delivering the full benefits promised. Reviews and checkpoints are intended to ensure investments deliver outcomes and value, but in practice, these can become closure points rather than the start of ongoing assurance. Reports such as the PAC’s 2024 review highlight persistent challenges: defining strategic objectives, quantifying expected value and tracking benefits once services or products are operational.
Strong delivery frameworks are common, but routine, robust assurance that benefits are owned, measured and reported after handover is often missing. Management quality is strongly linked to productivity and project outcomes, yet benefits tracking and realisation can be inconsistent, regardless of sector.
Practical steps for realising benefits
1. Ownership and accountability
Assign clear ownership for each major benefit. This should be someone with the authority to influence day - to - day operations, not just the project delivery lead. Document responsibilities for defining metrics, providing data, monitoring progress and reporting. Tie these responsibilities to performance objectives to ensure accountability.
2. Tracking and reporting
Use tools like benefits maps and driver trees to break down each benefit into lead (early) and lag (outcome) indicators. Build live dashboards to track progress, set baselines before launch and update regularly with real data and explanations for changes. Consistent follow-through is key to making benefits visible and actionable.
3. Regular review and early intervention
Establish a cadence for benefits reviews - such as an accelerated 3, 6 and 9 months or a more cautious 12, 24 and 60 months post launch - with independent checks where possible. Early intervention should focus on benefits, not just schedules. If warning signs appear (like low adoption), act quickly with targeted solutions such as training, communication, or tweaks to the process.
4. Managing change and avoiding fatigue
Monitor organisational capacity for change. Regularly assess the number and scale of initiatives, stakeholder sentiment, readiness and training completion. If capacity is stretched, slow down to avoid overwhelming teams and losing benefits. Sustainable change is essential for benefits to stick.
5. Data, audit and evidence
Predefine data sources, collection frequency and assurance steps for each benefit. Maintain a log of methods, baselines, calculations and decisions to ensure readiness for audits or stakeholder scrutiny. Credible, well-documented evidence turns claims into facts.
Delivery success rates and value leakage
Many organisations face challenges with cost and delivery times, and issues like risk aversion and a focus on predictability over efficiency are common. Value leakage - where benefits defined in business cases are not tracked or realised - remains a widespread concern. A ‘benefits led’ approach, embedding benefits management into governance and assigning clear ownership, is recommended for all types of organisations.
Planned and projected investments often reach into the hundreds of billions over multi-year periods. Regardless of sector, investment is critical to meeting infrastructure and strategic needs, but similar challenges in benefits realisation and delivery efficiency persist.
What “Good” looks like
- Every benefit has a named owner, with clear objectives and incentives.
- Live dashboards show progress from enablers to outcomes, updated regularly.
- Reviews are scheduled at key intervals, with independent checks where possible.
- Early warning triggers and funded recovery plans are in place.
- Change capacity is monitored and the pace is adjusted as needed.
- All evidence is audit - ready, with baselines and counterfactuals stored.
Conclusion
Embedding these habits into organisational practice addresses the common challenge of unclear value and weak follow - through after delivery. Early intervention and robust assurance throughout a project’s life are essential. Treating the final delivery gate as the start of benefits assurance - not the end of project reporting - helps stop value leakage, improves future business cases and rebuilds trust that investment delivers what it promises.
0 comments
Log in to post a comment, or create an account if you don't have one already.