Demonstrating value through Portfolio Management

Save for later

Favourite

Based upon my own experience I’m pleased to see that the number of organisations adopting portfolio management, particularly in the public sector, is increasing. I hope that portfolio management becomes ‘internalised’ and embedded in day to day working practice like some other initiatives you may be familiar with - best value, business process re-engineering and EQFM to name, but a few.

Most of us will agree that a Portfolio Office, operating closely to the Chief Executive, can provide timely information which should facilitate improved strategic decision making. However, my assertion is that this is just one of the functions portfolio management should perform and it must offer a great deal more if it is to demonstrate sustainable “value added”.

Gareth Morgan (Business strategist and author) uses the metaphor of a machine to describe bureaucratic hierarchies where strategy is the domain of the chief executive or ‘chief engineer’. The problem with many organisations with ‘machine characteristics’ is the implied assumption that all the important decisions are made at the top. Contemporary management theory (Senge, Lipman Blumen, Heifetz and Lawrie) questions the sustainability of this approach.

I have experience of portfolio management being introduced in a public sector organisation for the benefit of a privileged few very senior managers. What was eventually created was a detailed requirement to capture significant amounts of data from programmes and projects as part of an on-going monitoring regime. The major problem that occurred was that communication was entirely one way. The Portfolio Office became so overwhelmed with information flowing up that it did not have any time for the really important functions of filtering information down, sharing lessons, providing guidance and generally demonstrating value added to the hard pressed programme and project teams.

Benchmark data can be invaluable to programme and project teams and will lead to improved decision making at all levels within an organisation. I fear that many newly instigated portfolio management initiatives will join the list of ‘management fads’ and ’10 minute wonders’, unless added value sits at the heart of the regime.

default

Posted by Jim Dale on 17th Mar 2011

About the Author

Jim is an independent project management consultant, mentor and advisor. He is an APM accreditation assessor, an RPP assessor and a PQ facilitator and assessor. Jim has an MBA (pass with distinction) from CASS Business School and has achieved practitioner status in a suite of APMG methods. Jim’s early project background is in policing where he has managed several multi million pound transformational change initiatives, including setting up and delivering tranche 1 of Forensics21, leading a major root and branch review of Sussex Police and managing the introduction of a new call centre, digital telephony, a single non emergency number and ‘e’ contact for that force. Jim is a long standing committee member of ProgM and was the secretary for many years. He is currently studying for a professional doctorate focussing on developing best practice for collaboration programmes of transformational change. Several feature articles written by Jim has been published in academic and professional journals, including Project magazine.

Comments on this site are moderated. Please allow up to 24 hours for your comment to be published on this site. Thank you for adding your comment.
{{comments.length}}CommentComments
{{item.AuthorName}}

{{item.AuthorName}} {{item.AuthorName}} says on {{item.DateFormattedString}}:

Share this page

Login or Register to leave a comment:

Recommended news

Save for later

Favourite

Save for later

Favourite

Join APM

Sign up to the APM Newsletter.